The third lion of Arles has nothing to do with the ancient world,but only with the old one.The church of Saint Trophimus,whose wonderful Romanesque porch is the principal ornament of the principal place,a place otherwise distinguished by the presence of a slim and tapering obelisk in the middle,as well as by that of the Hotel de Ville and the museum the interesting church of Saint Trophimus swears a little,as the French say,with the peculiar character of Arles.It is very remarkable,but I would rather it were in another place.Arles is delightfully pagan,and Saint Trophimus,with its apostolic sculptures,is rather a false note.These sculptures are equally remarkable for their primitive vigor and for the perfect preservation in which they have come down to us.
The deep recess of a roundarched porch of the twelfth century is covered with quaint figures,which have not lost a nose or a finger.An angular,Byzantinelooking Christ sits in a diamondshaped frame at the summit of the arch,surrounded by little angels,by great apostles,by winged beasts,by a hundred sacred symbols and grotesque ornaments.It is a dense embroidery of sculpture,black with time,but as uninjured as if it had been kept under glass.One good mark for the French Revolution!Of the interior of the church,which has a nave of the twelfth century,and a choir three hundred years more recent,I chiefly remember the odd feature that the Romanesque aisles are so narrow that you literally or almost squeeze through them.You do so with some eagerness,for your natural purpose is to pass out to the cloister.This cloister,as distinguished and as perfect as the porch,has a great deal of charm.Its four sides,which are not of the same period (the earliest and best are of the twelfth century),have an elaborate arcade,supported on delicate pairs of columns,the capitals of which show an extraordinary variety of device and ornament.At the corners of the quadrangle these columns take the form of curious human figures.
The whole thing is a gem of lightness and preservation,and is often cited for its beauty;but if it doesn't sound too profane I prefer,especially at Arles,the ruins of the Roman theatre.The antique element is too precious to be mingled with anything less rare.This truth was very present to my mind during a ramble of a couple of hours that I took just before leaving the place;and the glowing beauty of the morning gave the last touch of the impression.Ispent half an hour at the Museum;then I took another look at the Roman theatre;after which I walked a little out of the town to the Aliscamps,the old Elysian Fields,the meagre remnant of the old pagan place of sepulture,which was afterwards used by the Christians,but has been for ages deserted,and now consists only of a melancholy avenue of cypresses,lined with a succession of ancient sarcophagi,empty,mossy,and mutilated.An ironfoundry,or some horrible establishment which is conditioned upon tall chimneys and a noise of hammering and banging,has been established near at hand;but the cypresses shut it out well enough,and this small patch of Elysium is a very romantic corner.
The door of the Museum stands ajar,and a vigilant custodian,with the usual batch of photographs on his mind,peeps out at you disapprovingly while you linger opposite,before the charming portal of Saint Trophimus,which you may look at for nothing.
When you succumb to the silent influence of his eye,and go over to visit his collection,you find yourself in a desecrated church,in which a variety of ancient objects,disinterred in Arlesian soil,have been arranged without any pomp.The best of these,I believe,were found in the ruins of the theatre.Some of the most curious of them are early Christian sarcophagi,exactly on the pagan model,but covered with rude yet vigorously wrought images of the apostles,and with illustrations of ural history.Beauty of the highest kind,either of conception or of execution,is absent from most of the Roman fragments,which belong to the taste of a late period and a provincial civilization.But a gulf divides them from the bristling little imagery of the Christian sarcophagi,in which,at the same time,one detects a vague emulation of the rich examples by which their authors were surrounded.There is a certain element of style in all the pagan things;there is not a hint of it in the early Christian relics,among which,according to M.Joanne,of the Guide,are to be found more fine sarcophagi than in any collection but that of St.John Lateran.In two or three of the Roman fragments there is a noticeable distinction;principally in a charming bust of a boy,quite perfect,with those salient eyes that one sees in certain antique busts,and to which the absence of vision in the marble mask gives a look,often very touching,as of a baffled effort to see;also in the head of a woman,found in the ruins of the theatre,who,alas!has lost her nose,and whose noble,simple contour,barring this deficiency,recalls the great manner of the Venus of Milo.There are various rich architectural fragments which indicate that that edifice was a very splendid affair.
This little Museum at Arles,in short,is the most Roman thing I know of,out of Rome.
