What I have now advanced is admitted by all theologians, as appears from the following axiom of Cardinal Bellarmine, a member of your Society: "General and lawful councils are incapable of error in defining the dogmas of faith;but they may err in questions of fact." In another place he says: "The pope, as pope, and even as the head of a universal council, may err in particular controversies of fact, which depend principally on the information and testimony of men." Cardinal Baronius speaks in the same manner: "Implicit submission is due to the decisions of councils in points of faith; but, in so far as persons and their writings are concerned, the censures which have been pronounced against them have not been so rigourously observed, because there is none who may not chance to be deceived in such matters."I may add that, to prove this point, the Archbishop of Toulouse has deduced the following rule from the letters of two great popes- St.Leon and Pelagius II: "That the proper object of councils is the faith; and whatsoever is determined by them, independently of the faith, may be reviewed and examined anew: whereas nothing ought to be re-examined that has been decided in a matter of faith; because, as Tertullian observes, the rule of faith alone is immovable and irrevocable." Hence it has been seen that, while general and lawful councils have never contradicted one another in points of faith, because, as M.de Toulouse has said, "it is not allowable to examine de novo decisions in matters of faith"; several instances have occurred in which these same councils have disagreed in points of fact, where the discussion turned upon the sense of an author; because, as the same prelate observes, quoting the popes as his authorities, "everything determined in councils, not referring to the faith, may be reviewed and examined de novo." An example of this contrariety was furnished by the fourth and fifth councils, which differed in their interpretation of the same authors.The same thing happened in the case of two popes, about a proposition maintained by certain monks of Scythia.Pope Hormisdas, understanding it in a bad sense, had condemned it; but Pope John II, his successor, upon re-examining the doctrine understood it in a good sense, approved it, and pronounced it to be orthodox.Would you say that for this reason one of these popes was a heretic? And must you not consequently acknowledge that, provided a person condemn the heretical sense which a pope may have ascribed to a book, he is no heretic because he declines condemning that book, while he understands it in a sense which it is certain the pope has not condemned? If this cannot be admitted, one of these popes must have fallen into error.I have been anxious to familiarize you with these discrepancies among Catholics regarding questions of fact, which involve the understanding of the sense of a writer, showing you father against father, pope against pope, and council against council, to lead you from these to other examples of opposition, similar in their nature, but somewhat more disproportioned in respect of the parties concerned.
同类推荐
热门推荐
江山风雨情之雍正与年妃
他,爱新觉罗•胤禛,历经九龙夺嫡,最终君临天下;她,名门闺秀,才貌双全。原本天作之合,佳偶一对,却阴差阳错,与爱擦肩。一个错付真心,一个心字成灰,一步错,步步过,错过今生,错过来世,何时才能真心真意爱一回?姐妹情深,兄妹情深,侯门一入深似海,爱恨情仇无止休。天赐良缘,天作之合,千里姻缘一线牵,鸳鸯误点为哪般。爱新觉罗•胤禛、年冰凝;爱新觉罗•胤祯,年玉盈,两兄弟、两姐妹,阴差阳错遇见你,生生世世不分离。本文讲述雍正皇帝与年妃的爱情故事,基本尊重历史,不宫斗,不滥情,不虐恋,数字军团靠边站,康熙也只打打酱油,偶尔搞笑,基本煸情,志矢不渝、无怨无悔,只为写出我心目中的四爷,写出我心目中的爱情。