It has had a name to live in some dogmatic theology, but each man's innocence and his real liking of his neighbor, have kept it a dead letter. I remember standing at the polls one day, when the anger of the political contest gave a certain grimness to the faces of the independent electors, and a good man at my side looking on the people, remarked, "I am satisfied that the largest part of these men, on either side, mean to vote right." I suppose, considerate observers looking at the masses of men, in their blameless, and in their equivocal actions, will assent, that in spite of selfishness and frivolity, the general purpose in the great number of persons is fidelity. The reason why any one refuses his assent to your opinion, or his aid to your benevolent design, is in you: he refuses to accept you as a bringer of truth, because, though you think you have it, he feels that you have it not. You have not given him the authentic sign. If it were worth while to run into details this general doctrine of the latent but ever soliciting Spirit, it would be easy to adduce illustration in particulars of a man's equality to the church, of his equality to the state, and of his equality to every other man. It is yet in all men's memory, that, a few years ago, the liberal churches complained, that the Calvinistic church denied to them the name of Christian. I think the complaint was confession: a religious church would not complain. A religious man like Behmen, Fox, or Swedenborg, is not irritated by wanting the sanction of the church, but the church feels the accusation of his presence and belief. It only needs, that a just man should walk in our streets, to make it appear how pitiful and inartificial a contrivance is our legislation. The man whose part is taken, and who does not walt for society in anything, has a power which society cannot choose but feel. The familiar experiment, called the hydrostatic paradox, in which a capillary column of water balances the ocean, is a symbol of the relation of one man to the whole family of men. The wise Dandini, on hearing the lives of Socrates, Pythagoras, and Diogenes read, "judged them to be great men every way, excepting, that they were too much subjected to the reverence of the laws, which to second and authorize, true virtue must abate very, much of its original vigor." And as a man is equal to the church, and equal to the state, so he is equal to every other man. The disparities of power in men are superficial; and all frank and searching conversation, in which a man lays himself open to his brother, apprizes each of their radical unity. When two persons sit and converse in a thoroughly good understanding, the remark is sure to be made, See how we have disputed about words! Let a clear, apprehensive mind, such as every man knows among his friends, converse with the most commanding poetic genius, I think, it would appear that there was no inequality such as men fancy between them; that a perfect understanding, a like receiving, a like perceiving, abolished differences, and the poet would confess, that his creative imagination gave him no deep advantage, but only the superficial one, that he could express himself, and the other could not; that his advantage was a knack, which might impose on indolent men, but could not impose on lovers of truth; for they know the tax of talent, or, what a price of greatness the power of expression too often pays. I believe it is the conviction of the purest men, that the net amount of man and man does not much vary. Each is incomparably superior to his companion in some faculty. His want of skill in other directions, has added to his fitness for his own work. Each seems to have some compensation yielded to him by his infirmity, and every hindrance operates as a concentration of his force. These and the like experiences intimate, that man stands in strict connexion with a higher fact never yet manifested. There is power over and behind us, and we are the channels of its communications. We seek to say thus and so, and over our head some spirit sits, which contradicts what we say. We would persuade our fellow to this or that; another self within our eyes dissuades him. That which we keep back, this reveals. In vain we compose our faces and our words; it holds uncontrollable communication with the enemy, and he answers civilly to us, but believes the spirit. We exclaim, `There's a traitor in the house!' but at last it appears that he is the true man, and I am the traitor.
同类推荐
热门推荐
第一邪君
当未来世界的牛逼上将穿越到一个四无少女(无自我、无智慧、无力量、无容颜)身上时…是束手待宰亦或是逆天改命?君邪,未来宇宙时代下的第一高手,因‘护宝’而与盗王‘同归于尽’,实则灵魂离体,被神秘的力量牵引到天玄大陆,重生为南宫世家八小姐——一个令她恨不得一掌把自己拍死的‘无盐废柴’,还顶着‘罪女’、‘野种’的双重罪名受尽欺凌。母被杀,她漠然转身,带着陌生的痛意毅然踏上一条末知的路…从此,南宫世家八小姐南宫君邪自世间抹去,绝尘天才少年君邪横空出世!一剑在手,万兽追随,上天入地,诛仙杀佛!精神异能,阴阳晶片,神魔俯首,群妖归顺!王者之巅,傲视乾坤,敢问苍穹谁主沉浮!【别人骂我太阴险,我笑他人太天真,不见满口仁义徒,无耻无德伪君子!】四界六域,三宗五家,神妖鬼魔,万兽奔啸,尔可惧之?君邪曰:哼哼,颠峰高手?不顺吾心,杀!百年大派?拂吾逆鳞,灭!上古法则?不合潮流,废!仙诀宝典?合吾意,取!神兽魔兽,入吾眼,收!奇珍异器?吾之爱,夺!五行,宇宙万物之根本,当五行被破坏,正气衰,邪气盛,妖魔乱舞;若五行消失,又当如何?君邪曰:如何?吾说了算!★★★★★★此文为东方玄幻,女主强大,以男装行天下,邪侫冷酷,狂傲腹黑,万事只凭本心;本文以励志成长为主题,不知情为何物的女主于成长冒险之路悟感天动地之亲情,问缠绵绯侧之爱情,交肝胆相照之友情。*****随风清的其他作品:《傲气皇妃》《军师王妃》《总裁的古妻》《月倾天下》《狂帝》《侧妃万万岁》【推荐玄幻好文】懒离婚《凤御万兽》懒离婚《重生一豪门邪女》【推荐徒儿好文】小悠闲《七岁小魔后》鸿越无晴《踹上天子》鸿越无晴《炎君弑魂》直面人性:弗洛伊德传
弗洛伊德是奥地利心理学家、精神病医师、精神分析学派创始人。主要着作有《梦的解析》《精神分析引论》。美国心理学家T.H.黧黑认为他与达尔文和马克思是引领20世纪西方思潮的三位先知。他的思想对个体心理学之父阿德勒、分析心理学创始人荣格等心理学家都产生过影响。他是人性的发现者,也是精神分析的创立者,但在他一生大半的时光里,他的发现给他带来的却是漫天风雨般的攻击与辱骂;他毕生忠于爱情,但被人骂作淫棍;他忠于友谊,但他的朋友却一个个弃他而去;他是医生,但被癌症折磨得死去活来,先后动过数十次手术。《直面人性:弗洛伊德传》一书是北大哲学博士文聘元教授十年心血沉淀,他查阅了大量的资料,用优美流畅的语言展现出了弗洛伊德才华横溢、传奇多彩的一生以及伟大的学术历程。追妻无门:女boss不好惹
青涩蜕变,如今她是能独当一面的女boss,爱了冷泽聿七年,也同样花了七年时间去忘记他。以为是陌路,他突然向他表白,扬言要娶她,她只当他是脑子抽风,他的殷勤她也全都无视。他帮她查她父母的死因,赶走身边情敌,解释当初拒绝她的告别,和故意对她冷漠都是无奈之举。突然爆出她父母的死居然和冷家有丝毫联系,还莫名跳出个公爵未婚夫,扬言要与她履行婚约。峰回路转,破镜还能重圆吗? PS:我又开新文了,每逢假期必书荒,新文《有你的世界遇到爱》,喜欢我的文的朋友可以来看看,这是重生类现言,对这个题材感兴趣的一定要收藏起来。