登陆注册
4909100000020

第20章

We have started out from the premises of political economy. We have accepted its language and its laws. We presupposed private property; the separation of labor, capital, and land, and likewise of wages, profit, and capital; the division of labor; competition; the conception of exchange value, etc. From political economy itself, using its own words, we have shown that the worker sinks to the level of a commodity, and moreover the most wretched commodity of all; that the misery of the worker is in inverse proportion to the power and volume of his production; that the necessary consequence of competition is the accumulation of capital in a few hands and hence the restoration of monopoly in a more terrible form; and that, finally, the distinction between capitalist and landlord, between agricultural worker and industrial worker, disappears and the whole of society must split into the two classes of property owners and propertyless workers .

Political economy proceeds from the fact of private property.

It does not explain it. It grasps the material process of private property, the process through which it actually passes, in general and abstract formulae which it then takes as laws . It does not Comprehend these laws -- i.e., it does not show how they arise from the nature of private property. Political economy fails to explain the reason for the division between labor and capital. For example, when it defines the relation of wages to profit, it takes the interests of the capitalists as the basis of its analysis -- i.e., it assumes what it is supposed to explain. Similarly, competition is frequently brought into the argument and explained in terms of external circumstances. Political economy teaches us nothing about the extent to which these external and apparently accidental circumstances are only the expression of a necessary development. We have seen how exchange itself appears to political economy as an accidental fact. The only wheels which political economy sets in motion are greed, and the war of the avaricious -- Competition .

Precisely because political economy fails to grasp the interconnections within the movement, it was possible to oppose, for example, the doctrine of competition to the doctrine of monopoly, the doctrine of craft freedom to the doctrine of the guild, and the doctrine of the division of landed property to the doctrine of the great estate; for competition, craft freedom, and division of landed property were developed and conceived only as accidental, deliberate, violent consequences of monopoly, of the guilds, and of feudal property, and not as their necessary, inevitable, and natural consequences.

We now have to grasp the essential connection between private property, greed, the separation of labor, capital and landed property, exchange and competition, value and the devaluation [ Entwertung ] of man, monopoly, and competition, etc. -- the connection between this entire system of estrangement [Entfremdung] and the money system.

We must avoid repeating the mistake of the political economist, who bases his explanations on some imaginary primordial condition. Such a primordial condition explains nothing. It simply pushes the question into the grey and nebulous distance. It assumes as facts and events what it is supposed to deduce -- namely, the necessary relationships between two things, between, for example, the division of labor and exchange. Similarly, theology explains the origin of evil by the fall of Man -- i.e., it assumes as a fact in the form of history what it should explain.

We shall start out from a present-day economic fact.

The worker becomes poorer the more wealth he produces, the more his production increases in power and extent. The worker becomes an ever cheaper commodity the more commodities he produces. The devaluation of the human world grows in direct proportion to the increase in value of the world of things. Labor not only produces commodities; it also produces itself and the workers as a commodity and it does so in the same proportion in which it produces commodities in general.

This fact simply means that the object that labor produces, it product, stands opposed to it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer. The product of labor is labor embodied and made material in an object, it is the objectification of labor. The realization of labor is its objectification. In the sphere of political economy, this realization of labor appears as a loss of reality for the worker, objectification as loss of and bondage to the object, and appropriation as estrangement, as alienation [Entausserung].

So much does the realization of labor appear as loss of reality that the worker loses his reality to the point of dying of starvation.

So much does objectification appear as loss of the object that the worker is robbed of the objects he needs most not only for life but also for work.

Work itself becomes an object which he can only obtain through an enormous effort and with spasmodic interruptions. So much does the appropriation of the object appear as estrangement that the more objects the worker produces the fewer can he possess and the more he falls under the domination of his product, of capital.

All these consequences are contained in this characteristic, that the workers is related to the product of labor as to an alien object.

For it is clear that, according to this premise, the more the worker exerts himself in his work, the more powerful the alien, objective world becomes which he brings into being over against himself, the poorer he and his inner world become, and the less they belong to him. It is the same in religion. The more man puts into God, the less he retains within himself.

The worker places his life in the object; but now it no longer belongs to him, but to the object. The greater his activity, therefore, the fewer objects the worker possesses. What the product of his labor is, he is not.

同类推荐
  • 奇效简便良方

    奇效简便良方

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 孝道吴许二真君传

    孝道吴许二真君传

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 太平经合校

    太平经合校

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 贤愚因缘经

    贤愚因缘经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 吴船录

    吴船录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 佛说咒魅经

    佛说咒魅经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 追妻无门:女boss不好惹

    追妻无门:女boss不好惹

    青涩蜕变,如今她是能独当一面的女boss,爱了冷泽聿七年,也同样花了七年时间去忘记他。以为是陌路,他突然向他表白,扬言要娶她,她只当他是脑子抽风,他的殷勤她也全都无视。他帮她查她父母的死因,赶走身边情敌,解释当初拒绝她的告别,和故意对她冷漠都是无奈之举。突然爆出她父母的死居然和冷家有丝毫联系,还莫名跳出个公爵未婚夫,扬言要与她履行婚约。峰回路转,破镜还能重圆吗? PS:我又开新文了,每逢假期必书荒,新文《有你的世界遇到爱》,喜欢我的文的朋友可以来看看,这是重生类现言,对这个题材感兴趣的一定要收藏起来。
  • 网游之男神大大好难攻略

    网游之男神大大好难攻略

    网游美女大神,因怕男神苏莫辰认出她并记她的仇不得不假扮丑女接近他,并成功和男神结成了玄镜游戏上的情缘,可是俗话说的好只保不住火,在竞技大赛结束后,苏莫辰邀请几人去旅游,终究识破了林晓阡就是当年的情人(女朋友)……林晓阡在追(攻略)男神的路上发现越来越不顺利,但她不放弃,最后她才发现自己中了一个人一开始就已经布好的局,而入局的所有人都毫无还手之力……身世之谜?记忆之谜?人物之谜?都将展开。
  • 夜访者

    夜访者

    1679年初秋的一天傍晚,一位不速之客拜访了隐居石船山的王夫之,告诉了他一个关于明末历争的秘密。
  • 爱的禁忌乐章

    爱的禁忌乐章

    前一晚,明明还是哥哥送来的生日礼物——十二星座仿真人偶,怎么一夕之间,竟然变成了身份显贵的真人美少年!皇室吸血鬼,狼人少主,九尾妖狐……我的妈妈咪,这是要神仙开会吗?只是这会没开成,倒是被他们威逼加胁迫的签下了诸多不平等条约,唉……
  • 电视剧里一个能打的都没有

    电视剧里一个能打的都没有

    回忆童年——那些年,我们一起看过的电视剧!少年黄飞鸿、少年包青天。少年张三丰、少年······
  • 潜入皇家美男团

    潜入皇家美男团

    她被他囚禁,终于逃脱,又遇上那一个个的美男,本以为成功逃脱,却又再次被他抓住。“奕儿,再敢逃跑,小心我收拾你。”不止如此,他竟然说:“你不该姓‘洛’”她到底是谁?时别三年,本以为已经死掉的她以当红歌星的身份华丽归来,这一次她要让所有人知道谁才是真正的女王!
  • 向上的青春要向下扎根

    向上的青春要向下扎根

    以主人公盛夏考研为线,展开叙述,记述当代考研党这一路的酸甜苦辣。
  • 天下大安

    天下大安

    史书记载了大成安庆年间的那一场大乱,也记载了大成朝的中盛之兴,更是记载了大成朝唯一的女帝——天曙女帝李宪波澜壮阔的一生。唯有李宪自己清楚,从一开始她想要的不过是能跟在兄长身后。兄长在,家便安在。可这世间事,向来善变。“我李宪要得便是这万里山河,兄长留下的一切,我都会守住!”只愿从此以后,天下大安!PS:1.以亲情、事业线为主,感情线为辅。2.女主成长型。3.无绝对善恶之分。4.封面乃作者自己所做,求轻点吐槽!
  • 新时期农村社区建设与管理

    新时期农村社区建设与管理

    《新时期农村社区建设与管理》是针对广大从事基层农村社区工作者编写的一本培训教材。《新时期农村社区建设与管理》主要介绍了有关农村社区建设的理论依据、基本常识和操作规范,重点阐述了我们新时期农村社区建设的目标、原则和内容,并对当前我国农村社区建设实践中突出的成功模式、典型案例做了分析说明。《新时期农村社区建设与管理》在介绍相关知识的同时,也提供了一些具体的工作方法和工作经验,希望对广大从事农村社区建设的工作者能提供借鉴和帮助。