"You have touched upon a subject, senor canon," observed the curate here, "that has awakened an old enmity I have against the plays in vogue at the present day, quite as strong as that which I bear to the books of chivalry; for while the drama, according to Tully, should be the mirror of human life, the model of manners, and the image of the truth, those which are presented now-a-days are mirrors of nonsense, models of folly, and images of lewdness. For what greater nonsense can there be in connection with what we are now discussing than for an infant to appear in swaddling clothes in the first scene of the first act, and in the second a grown-up bearded man? Or what greater absurdity can there be than putting before us an old man as a swashbuckler, a young man as a poltroon, a lackey using fine language, a page giving sage advice, a king plying as a porter, a princess who is a kitchen-maid? And then what shall I say of their attention to the time in which the action they represent may or can take place, save that I have seen a play where the first act began in Europe, the second in Asia, the third finished in Africa, and no doubt, had it been in four acts, the fourth would have ended in America, and so it would have been laid in all four quarters of the globe? And if truth to life is the main thing the drama should keep in view, how is it possible for any average understanding to be satisfied when the action is supposed to pass in the time of King Pepin or Charlemagne, and the principal personage in it they represent to be the Emperor Heraclius who entered Jerusalem with the cross and won the Holy Sepulchre, like Godfrey of Bouillon, there being years innumerable between the one and the other? or, if the play is based on fiction and historical facts are introduced, or bits of what occurred to different people and at different times mixed up with it, all, not only without any semblance of probability, but with obvious errors that from every point of view are inexcusable? And the worst of it is, there are ignorant people who say that this is perfection, and that anything beyond this is affected refinement.
同类推荐
热门推荐
甜文系统之盼汝快乐
顾盼，读音为gùpàn。古语有云：巧笑倩兮，美目盼兮，一颦一笑，顾盼生姿。她的名字便是顾盼。这个名字，若是在一个爱笑的姑娘，配上笑容不知道多引人入胜。只是她的人生，能展颜的事情实在是不多。本以为，人生就要这样过下去了。在一个平凡的日子里，她却被送到了一个未知的地方。在这里，她拥有了不曾有过的疼惜。过往的一切苦痛，仿佛都远离了她，就在她想努力生活下去的时候。一个自称工号520的客服，说她只是被绑定了一个甜文系统，让她完成一个任务。这明明是她的人生，什么时候变成了一个任务？原来偷来的东西，不管你在手心里捂了多久，都不是你的。在这样艰难的抉择的时候，我们要怎么办呢？就在她因为偷了别人的人生煎熬之际，才知道那一罐她惦记了很久的糖，本就是给她的。她之所以会来到这里，和所谓的系统没有一点关系她为爱而来。那她因为这坑爹的系统招惹的人怎么办？知止自能除妄想《传家宝》石成金我很喜欢这句话，顾盼是贪恋这人世温暖的，可是因为良心它是一个三角，滚动起来的时候善良的人都会被这尖角划伤所以，善良的她想要结束这一切所以最后才能得到幸福吧文案无能患者，总之我是打算写一本甜文。(*￣︶￣)
穿到皇家开赌场：大胆宫婢
她是戏耍暴君大胆到不行的冒牌小宫婢，她是指点妃子们用尽心计俘获君心的黑手，她是被绝色少年盟主捧在手心的丫头，她更是被喻为商界奇才地神仙公子云少，倾城多情惹得无数少女伤碎芳心。江湖传闻她是医圣的徒弟，可又不懂半点医术，商界传闻她喜好男色身边又坐拥无数美女，真真假假实在难辨……
极品老婆妖孽夫
被冥王批作阴险狡诈、卑鄙无耻、歹毒狠戾、乃女子中小人的佣兵之王——血狐狸，因为一场神的赌约死而重生。人生多磨难，重生的便宜不好占！一体两魂？不好意思！既然她来了就没有走的道理。管你正主是谁，有多远滚多远。这巢，她占定了。豪门恩怨多，水深不见底？那她偏要趟浑水！你口蜜腹剑惹她不安生，她笑里藏刀搅你全家不太平！商场如战场，明枪暗箭接连不暇？那她就缴了人的枪、断了人的箭，阴谋阳谋轮番上，看谁技高一筹！人生多精彩，异能人士组队来！欺负她没异能？那不过是她闲来消遣的东西！只要拥有强悍的灵魂，照样混得风生水起。更何况，不知道她重生的福利是开挂？人生有惊喜，桃花朵朵袭！未婚夫悔婚？切！爱情无用，要来干什么？只是，要甩也由她先甩！无情无爱一身轻，却有妖孽死皮赖脸缠。重生后的第一次见面，他是万众瞩目的娱乐界新宠，擦肩而过之时，她披着的外套拂过了他的手臂。她嗤鼻：“不过是个戏子！”他脚步微顿，纸巾擦手：“总算干净了。”她外套一脱，顺手扔进垃圾桶：“晦气！”第二次相见，人来人往的街道上，风情万种的她一手吊儿郎当晃荡着手里的恨天高，一脚光溜溜踩着地上小贼的胸口：“找死？”街边跑车内妖孽般的他看得目瞪口呆：“奇葩！”回眸，万分妩媚撩发，优雅对他竖起中指，转身离去时嘴型可见二字：“傻B！”掉落的烟头在半空悬浮，他似笑非笑：“有趣！”第三次、第四次......“你滚不滚？”她白眼大翻。“一起滚！”他笑得不怀好意。既然甩不开、赶不走、打不跑，那就——扑倒独占！携手并肩、为祸天下！本文一对一都市异能重生女强爽文！各位看官若是喜欢，请持续关注《极品老婆妖孽夫》！
三生三世云归阙
三千年前她匆匆一别坠入凡尘，三千年后他等到了她的转世。你可知晓那些琴弦是何物所铸，每一根皆是情深似海。你可知何为情蛊，心不动则不痛，心若动则剖心噬骨。你可知何为情缠，情缠情缠，若有情才能缠，若无情，怎能缠？你可知晓起死回生的代价是什么，以我之心，为你引魂。你可知何为生死蛊，生死蛊，你生，我死。三世情缘两世师徒，谁曾知晓那个高高在上的昆仑仙尊竟有一日也会爱上自己的徒弟，痴念情字，为爱成魔。师徒无法在一起就不做师父，神魔无法在一起那就逆了这天道。“以前每次都是我看着你走，这一次终于轮到你看着我了，对不起，这一次要丢下你了。”风夜凌，葵花开了，你怎么还不回来？推荐新文《快穿之男神总想毒死我》《一生一世美人谋》
追妻无门：女boss不好惹
青涩蜕变，如今她是能独当一面的女boss，爱了冷泽聿七年，也同样花了七年时间去忘记他。以为是陌路，他突然向他表白，扬言要娶她，她只当他是脑子抽风，他的殷勤她也全都无视。他帮她查她父母的死因，赶走身边情敌，解释当初拒绝她的告别，和故意对她冷漠都是无奈之举。突然爆出她父母的死居然和冷家有丝毫联系，还莫名跳出个公爵未婚夫，扬言要与她履行婚约。峰回路转，破镜还能重圆吗？ PS:我又开新文了，每逢假期必书荒，新文《有你的世界遇到爱》，喜欢我的文的朋友可以来看看，这是重生类现言，对这个题材感兴趣的一定要收藏起来。