登陆注册
5656400000017

第17章

I made these and some similar observations; but Protagoras would not distinctly say which he would do. Thereupon Alcibiades turned to Callias, and said:-Do you think, Callias, that Protagoras is fair in refusing to say whether he will or will not answer? for I certainly think that he is unfair; he ought either to proceed with the argument, or distinctly refuse to proceed, that we may know his intention; and then Socrates will be able to discourse with some one else, and the rest of the company will be free to talk with one another.

I think that Protagoras was really made ashamed by these words of Alcibiades and when the prayers of Callias and the company were superadded, he was at last induced to argue, and said that I might ask and he would answer.

So I said: Do not imagine, Protagoras, that I have any other interest in asking questions of you but that of clearing up my own difficulties. For I think that Homer was very right in saying thatWhen two go together, one sees before the other,for all men who have a companion are readier in deed, word, or thought; but if a manSees a thing when he is alone,he goes about straightway seeking until he finds some one to whom he may show his discoveries, and who may confirm him in them. And I would rather hold discourse with you than with any one, because I think that no man has a better understanding of most things which a good man may be expected to understand, and in particular of virtue. For who is there, but you?-who not only claim to be a good man and a gentleman, for many are this, and yet have not the power of making others good whereas you are not only good yourself, but also the cause of goodness in others. Moreover such confidence have you in yourself, that although other Sophists conceal their profession, you proclaim in the face of Hellas that you are a Sophist or teacher of virtue and education, and are the first who demanded pay in return. How then can I do otherwise than invite you to the examination of these subjects, and ask questions and consult with you? I must, indeed.

And I should like once more to have my memory refreshed by you about the questions which I was asking you at first, and also to have your help in considering them. If I am not mistaken the question was this: Are wisdom and temperance and courage and justice and holiness five names of the same thing? or has each of the names a separate underlying essence and corresponding thing having a peculiar function, no one of them being like any other of them? And you replied that the five names were not the names of the same thing, but that each of them had a separate object, and that all these objects were parts of virtue, not in the same way that the parts of gold are like each other and the whole of which they are parts, but as the parts of the face are unlike the whole of which they are parts and one another, and have each of them a distinct function. I should like to know whether this is still your opinion; or if not, I will ask you to define your meaning, and I shall not take you to task if you now make a different statement. For I dare say that you may have said what you did only in order to make trial of me.

I answer, Socrates, he said, that all these qualities are parts of virtue, and that four out of the five are to some extent similar, and that the fifth of them, which is courage, is very different from the other four, as I prove in this way: You may observe that many men are utterly unrighteous, unholy, intemperate, ignorant, who are nevertheless remarkable for their courage.

Stop, I said; I should like to think about that. When you speak of brave men, do you mean the confident, or another sort of nature?

Yes, he said; I mean the impetuous, ready to go at that which others are afraid to approach.

In the next place, you would affirm virtue to be a good thing, of which good thing you assert yourself to be a teacher.

Yes, he said; I should say the best of all things, if I am in my right mind.

And is it partly good and partly bad, I said, or wholly good?

Wholly good, and in the highest degree.

Tell me then; who are they who have confidence when diving into a well?

I should say, the divers.

And the reason of this is that they have knowledge?

Yes, that is the reason.

And who have confidence when fighting on horseback-the skilled horseman or the unskilled?

The skilled.

And who when fighting with light shields-the peltasts or the nonpeltasts?

The peltasts. And that is true of all other things, he said, if that is your point: those who have knowledge are more confident than those who have no knowledge, and they are more confident after they have learned than before.

And have you not seen persons utterly ignorant, I said, of these things, and yet confident about them?

Yes, he said, I have seen such persons far too confident.

And are not these confident persons also courageous?

In that case, he replied, courage would be a base thing, for the men of whom we are speaking are surely madmen.

Then who are the courageous? Are they not the confident?

Yes, he said; to that statement I adhere.

And those, I said, who are thus confident without knowledge are really not courageous, but mad; and in that case the wisest are also the most confident, and being the most confident are also the bravest, and upon that view again wisdom will be courage.

Nay, Socrates, he replied, you are mistaken in your remembrance of what was said by me. When you asked me, I certainly did say that the courageous are the confident; but I was never asked whether the confident are the courageous; if you had asked me, I should have answered "Not all of them": and what I did answer you have not proved to be false, although you proceeded to show that those who have knowledge are more courageous than they were before they had knowledge, and more courageous than others who have no knowledge, and were then led on to think that courage is the same as wisdom.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 侯门骄妃

    侯门骄妃

    杨骄觉得自己前世很冤,无缘无故的卷进别人的复仇计划中,家破人亡。现在想想,她也冤不到哪里去,谁叫自己一家都活的自以为是呢?不过这一次,复仇的你们遇到同样要复仇的我,狭路相逢,重生者胜!
  • 人道圣王

    人道圣王

    太古蛮荒,万族争锋,神魔统治天下。浩浩天域,茫茫星空,无尽的传说无尽的宝藏。这是个波澜壮阔的大世,神圣携妖魔共舞。这也是原始残酷的乱世,荣耀与枯骨并存。大争之世,看少年英豪,聚龙魂,斩妖魔,血战三万里,率人族杀出大荒!问苍茫大地,谁主沉浮?唯我圣王!
  • 雁过无声(中篇小说)

    雁过无声(中篇小说)

    燕子走了。燕子究竟去了什么地方,我至今也不知道。是燕子哥哥打电话告诉我消息的。我立即赶到燕子的家里,她的父母坐在阴暗而狭小的堂屋,一脸冷漠地看着我走进来,我问燕子真的走了?他们却几乎齐声责问我,她人呢?似乎是我把他们的女儿弄跑的。燕子的哥哥比较通情达理,知道我爱他的妹妹这些年不容易,他妹妹的走我心里十分难过;他从房里走出来,冲他的父母说,你们不要难为阿贵了,燕子走了,阿贵比我们还心急哩!然后他就把我从堂屋拉出来,走到外面的破烂的厨房旁边,像是有什么秘密似的跟我说,你回吧,待在这里他们还会说你不是的,以后有我妹妹的消息别忘了告诉我一声。他以为他妹妹会很快就跟我联系的。
  • 冰霜之主的复辟

    冰霜之主的复辟

    在遥远的极寒之处,冰霜魔神向他跪拜,翼可遮天的冰霜巨龙是他的坐骑,不计其数的雪族战士共同呼喊一个名字——冰霜之主!.................在这个危机四起的世界,有巨龙,大炮,魔法,巫术,军队...以及厮杀!当兵临城下之际,生死存亡之时。他蓦然回首,身后是无畏的雪族战士!他挥舞战旗大吼着:“雪族永不为奴!!!” 当我重临之时,誓要把这不洁的世界搅得天翻地覆!
  • 鱼鸟深情

    鱼鸟深情

    他,是演技与颜值俱佳的实力小生;她,是默默无闻平淡无奇的失婚妈妈。她说,他是鸟,她是鱼,相遇只是一个意外;他却说,正因为这个意外才注定了无法离开。鸟儿为了鱼儿降落湖边,鱼儿为了鸟儿学会在空气中呼吸。鱼与鸟,是意外却不减深情!
  • 追妻无门:女boss不好惹

    追妻无门:女boss不好惹

    青涩蜕变,如今她是能独当一面的女boss,爱了冷泽聿七年,也同样花了七年时间去忘记他。以为是陌路,他突然向他表白,扬言要娶她,她只当他是脑子抽风,他的殷勤她也全都无视。他帮她查她父母的死因,赶走身边情敌,解释当初拒绝她的告别,和故意对她冷漠都是无奈之举。突然爆出她父母的死居然和冷家有丝毫联系,还莫名跳出个公爵未婚夫,扬言要与她履行婚约。峰回路转,破镜还能重圆吗? PS:我又开新文了,每逢假期必书荒,新文《有你的世界遇到爱》,喜欢我的文的朋友可以来看看,这是重生类现言,对这个题材感兴趣的一定要收藏起来。
  • 非常家庭关系

    非常家庭关系

    婆媳是永远说不完的话题,婆媳关系里再加上前妻前孩、同父异母秉性各异的兄弟姐妹,还有剪不断理还乱的各种亲友关系,加上本身人在中年的情感动荡,希望能好看。
  • 全球怪物在线

    全球怪物在线

    天才科学家以“梦幻因子”把全球进行了游戏化。游戏之后,大量的生物变成了各种的怪物:丧尸,魔兽,巨龙!部分的人类更加是被强制登陆游戏,化身为各种职业,在这个名为“全球怪物OL”的真实游戏之中,挣扎救存。
  • 追妻无门:女boss不好惹

    追妻无门:女boss不好惹

    青涩蜕变,如今她是能独当一面的女boss,爱了冷泽聿七年,也同样花了七年时间去忘记他。以为是陌路,他突然向他表白,扬言要娶她,她只当他是脑子抽风,他的殷勤她也全都无视。他帮她查她父母的死因,赶走身边情敌,解释当初拒绝她的告别,和故意对她冷漠都是无奈之举。突然爆出她父母的死居然和冷家有丝毫联系,还莫名跳出个公爵未婚夫,扬言要与她履行婚约。峰回路转,破镜还能重圆吗? PS:我又开新文了,每逢假期必书荒,新文《有你的世界遇到爱》,喜欢我的文的朋友可以来看看,这是重生类现言,对这个题材感兴趣的一定要收藏起来。
  • On the Parts of Animals

    On the Parts of Animals

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。