Abbadie says in his famous book,that the Gospel of St.Matthew is cited by Clemens,bishop of Rome,a disciple of the apostles;that Barnabas cites it in his epistle;that Ignatius and Polycarp receive it;and that the same fathers,that give testimony for Matthew,give it likewise for Mark.Nay your lordship will find,I believe,that the present bishop of London,in his third pastoral letter,speaks to the same effect.I will not trouble you nor myself with any more instances of the same kind.Let this,which occurred to me as I was writing,suffice.It may well suffice;for I presume the fact advanced by the minister and the bishop is a mistake.If the fathers of the first century do mention some passages that are agreeable to what we read in our evangelists,will it follow that these fathers had the same gospels before them?To say so is a manifest abuse of history,and quite inexcusable in writers that knew,or should have known,that these fathers made use of other gospels,wherein such passages might be contained,or they might be preserved in unwritten tradition.Besides which,I could almost venture to affirm that these fathers of the first century do not expressly name the gospels we have of Matthew,Mark,Luke,and John.To the two reasons that have been given why those who make divinity their profession,should study history,particularly ecclesiastical history,with an honest and serious application;in order to support Christianity against the attacks of unbelievers,and to remove the doubts and prejudices that the unfair proceedings of men of their own order have raised in minds candid but not implicit,willing to be informed but curious to examine;to these,I say,we may add another consideration that seems to me of no small importance.Writers of the Roman religion have attempted to show,that the text of the holy writ is on many accounts insufficient to be the sole criterion of orthodoxy:I apprehend too that they have shown it.Sure I am that experience,from the first promulgation of Christianity to this hour,shows abundantly with how much ease and success the most opposite,the most extravagant,nay,the most impious opinions,and the most contradictory faiths,may be founded on the same text;and plausibly defended by the same authority.Writers of the reformed religion have erected their batteries against tradition;and the only difficulty they had to encounter in this enterprise lay in levelling and pointing their cannon so as to avoid demolishing,in one common ruin,the traditions they retain,and those they reject.Each side has been employed to weaken the cause and explode the system of his adversary:and,whilst they have been so employed,they have jointly laid their axes to the root of Christianity:for thus men will be apt to reason upon what they have advanced."If the text has not that authenticity,clearness,and precision which are necessary to establish it as a divine and a certain rule of faith and practice;and if the tradition of the church,from the first ages of it till the days of Luther and Calvin,has been corrupted itself,and has served to corrupt the faith and practice of Christians;there remains at this time no standard at all of Christianity.By consequence,either this religion was not originally of divine institution,or else God has not provided effectually for preserving the genuine purity of it,and the gates of hell have actually prevailed,in contradiction to his promise,against the church."The best effect of this reasoning that can be hoped for,is,that men should f all into theism,and subscribe to the first proposition;he must be worse than an atheist who can affirm the last.The dilemma is terrible,my lord.Party zeal and private interest have formed it:the common interest of Christianity is deeply concerned to solve it.Now,I presume,it can never be solved without a more accurate examination,not only of the Christian but of the Jewish system,than learned men have been hitherto impartial enough and sagacious enough to take,or honest enough to communicate.Whilst the authenticity and sense of the text of the bible remain as disputable,and whilst the tradition of the church remains as problematical,to say no worse,as the immense labors of the Christian divines in several communions have made them appear to be;Christianity may lean on the civil and ecclesiastical power,and be supported by the forcible influence of education:but the proper force of religion,that force which subdues the mind,and awes the conscience by conviction,will be wanting.
同类推荐
热门推荐
重生之影帝大叔的小娇妻
国际女星和神秘男子情人节游玩的消息刚刚报道出来,立马女星安琪就和影帝古乐宸官宣二人的恋情。恋情一出之后,所有人都很震惊,要知道俩个人从来没有交集的人,竟然秘密恋爱了,这个事情真的是晴天霹雳。,,,,,,“大叔,谢谢你包容我的一切。”“你是不是傻啊!是我应该谢谢你,能够出现在我的生命里,要不是因为有你的存在,我都不知道自己什么时候才会有个家。”全文纯属虚构,请勿当真,重生异能:暗黑娇妻不好惹
她是第一杀手‘凛’,是精通三十六项绝技,一手捣毁整个岛屿的传说。同样也是异能界中,编号为006的未知异能者杀手,代号“万物终结”无人敢惹的死神。重生之前,她身为继承者,却在幼时便被家族人盯上,丢入孤岛。长大更是在组织之间流转,被迫为组织卖命没有一丝自由。还好的是,她遇到了他,他给了她这世界上第一缕温暖,让她活的像个人,教她温软的微笑。可惜好梦不长,他居然成了她的目标。重生之后,她花费十一年,为他捣毁了整个组织。抹杀掉了任何威胁他生命之人。同时,意外的收获到了四个如家人一般的队友,还有一个无条件信任她的姐姐,并偶然进入了娱乐圈。这次,她将以最耀眼的姿态重回家族,夺回应当属于她的东西。追妻无门:女boss不好惹
青涩蜕变,如今她是能独当一面的女boss,爱了冷泽聿七年,也同样花了七年时间去忘记他。以为是陌路,他突然向他表白,扬言要娶她,她只当他是脑子抽风,他的殷勤她也全都无视。他帮她查她父母的死因,赶走身边情敌,解释当初拒绝她的告别,和故意对她冷漠都是无奈之举。突然爆出她父母的死居然和冷家有丝毫联系,还莫名跳出个公爵未婚夫,扬言要与她履行婚约。峰回路转,破镜还能重圆吗? PS:我又开新文了,每逢假期必书荒,新文《有你的世界遇到爱》,喜欢我的文的朋友可以来看看,这是重生类现言,对这个题材感兴趣的一定要收藏起来。