登陆注册
5343800000066

第66章

A well-known Russian economist, Professor Ivanukoff,(3*) has tried to show to what extent the press shared with the Government the difficult task of elaborating the scheme, according to which the serfs were to obtain "freedom and land." He is quite correct when he says that, with the exception of a single paper called the Journal of Landed Proprietors, the whole Russian Press unanimously declared itself in favour, not only of the abolition of personal servitude, but also of the endowment of the peasants with land. Such writers as Katkof, the well-known editor of the Moscow Gazette, a man who has lately played so prominent a part in the reactionary movement, were then the open friends of Liberalism, and rivalled the most advanced reformers in their defence of civil freedom. The opinions of Katkof were so greatly at variance with those of the Government at the beginning of the movement, that he was obliged to bring to a close a series of articles on the social condition of the serfs which he had begun in his periodical, the Russian Courier. Another eminent publicist, Koschelev, who was the author of one of the numerous private schemes of emancipation (their number amounted to sixty-one), was obliged at the same time to abandon the further publication of a journal called the Welfare of the Country, on account of the strong language in which he advocated the endowment of the liberated serf with those portions of the land already in his possession. A Russian magazine of great renown, the Contemporary, was at the same time on the point of being suppressed on account of an article written by Professor Kavelin, expressing his views as to the opportuneness of redeeming the lands actually possessed by the peasants, and that, too, with the direct help of the State. The Minister of Public instruction, Evgraf Kovalevsky, was even asked to issue a circular, by which the censorship was entrusted with the power of suppressing any article, pamphlet, or book, dealing with the question of enfranchisement, that had not previously been approved by the central committee. This untimely warfare against public opinion and the liberty of the press, fortunately enough, did not last long. The circular was printed in April, 1858, and seven months later the Government relaxed the restrictions imposed; and that because of the complete change in its own views as to the outlines of the reform. The opinions recently suppressed became those of the Government, and the prosecuted writers were considered, for a while at least, its surest allies. I insist on these facts, because I know of no instance which better characterises the ordinary proceedings of the Russian bureaucracy. It begins, as a rule, by suppressing all that lies in its way, and then, finding no other issue, it adopts the line of conduct which it has recently condemned. A foreigner who has no notion of this mode of procedure must find great difficulty in understanding how it happens that in a country where no freedom of the press is recognised, in which generals and high officials seem alone to have the right of professing opinions on public matters, the press, nevertheless, has more than once exercised a decisive influence on the course of politics. The all-powerful bureaucracy is very often but an empty-headed fool, anxious to accept the ideas of the despised and prosecuted journalist. In Russia, as well as everywhere else, the true and lasting power is that of public opinion, and of those who know how to influence it. Periods in which the Government acts contrary to public opinion occur from time to time. They are very harmful to those who dare to remain faithful to their opinions. For a while nothing is heard of but the need of suppression both of opinions and of those who publicly profess them. But time passes and the Government begins to reap the fruits of its own sowing. At every step it takes, it finds on the part of those it governs nothing but ill-will, a hidden but profound mistrust. As soon as it feels that it is losing all hold on the minds and hearts of the people, it is the first to condemn what it has recently praised. Some fine morning everybody is stalled by learning that the very men who had done their best to render impossible the public expression of certain ideas are now drawing their inspiration from these same ideas.

But I feel that I have made perhaps a necessary, but at all events a too long, digression from the direct line of my inquiries. I will therefore return to them at once, and begin by pointing out those points on which the committee appointed to elaborate the law of enfranchisement carried out in their scheme -- the opinions of the press.

It was the press which first advocated the notion that the liberated peasant ought to become the owner of the land actually in his possession. Schemes for realising this idea had been already worked out in the reign of Nicholas by some patriotic scholars and publicists. Among them was Professor Kavelin, whose project was published by the Russian contemporary, at the head of other articles, on the impending reform. It was on Kavelin that first fell the responsibility of expressing ideas in opposition to the views of the Government. His opinion as to the necessity of endowing the peasant with land soon found an echo in the debates of the nobility of Tver, who petitioned the Czar to extend his promise concerning grants of land to the enfranchised serf, not only to his homestead and the ground surrounding it, but also to the shares the peasant possessed in the open fields of the village. In giving an account of the different opinions expressed by the provincial nobility, the central committee referred to this scheme proposed by the nobility of Tver, and recommended it to the Government. Thus we see how prominent a part the press played on this occasion.

同类推荐
  • 祛蔽

    祛蔽

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 天然居士怀净土诗

    天然居士怀净土诗

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • John Jacob Astor

    John Jacob Astor

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 劝发菩提心文

    劝发菩提心文

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
  • 林间录

    林间录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。
热门推荐
  • 极品兽王猎

    极品兽王猎

    一个看夜间超市的宅男,无意间穿越到魔兽,作为万年兽王的他,带着坑爹系统,在魔兽的世界里,有怎样的故事:开启野兽之眼,控制着大熊,我擦,这四蹄驱动,就是不一样啊,这触感,嗯,还舔舔熊掌,有点咸,突然颜赦发现大家以一种看傻子的眼光看着颜赦,在大家一脸关爱的眼神下,颜赦一扭熊屁股就没影了,一会颜赦就看见霍格在前方晃悠,颜赦找了一个草丛,眼看霍格要走过来,颜赦控制着熊冲出草丛,大喊一声:德玛西亚!对霍格跳起了哈林摇,对就是哈林摇,看的霍格目瞪口呆心想:我特么居然被一只熊调戏了,还特么是头公的
  • 勇者的假期

    勇者的假期

    勇者失去了女神的加护。重回巅峰之路,各方势力纷至沓来,阴谋诡计蠢蠢欲动。所谓的强大,究竟是指你所掌握的力量,还是你这个人本身?
  • 七里樱

    七里樱

    年少时,我们,似乎成为了世界的主角,遗憾过,苦恼过,伤心心过,但庆幸的是在那个即将逝去的青春里,你世界的男主随着四季辗转在你身旁,陪你笑,陪你哭……终有一天,你发现他只是喜欢你身边的那个人而已…“你知道的,我喜欢她哎。”“没事…”至少我的青春,你来过就好。
  • 阴阳师·生成姬

    阴阳师·生成姬

    平安京中,贵族藤原济时与情人绫子受鬼魅所袭,性命垂危。阴阳师安倍晴明同好友源博雅追查此事,发现背后别有隐情。风起云涌的相扑大会、破裂的琵琶“飞天”,向神明祈求化身为鬼的女人……重重迷雾之下,究竟是谁的诅咒化作狰狞面目,又是谁的怨恨深切入骨?
  • 神医不爱治病

    神医不爱治病

    现代27岁上官枫与古代9岁上官枫灵魂互换,是老天的玩笑还是怜悯,或者仅仅只是把该属于那个世界的灵魂回归了原处而已。27岁的她是这一届中表现最好的实习医生,临危受命却换来无情抛弃,自此四面八方的舆论直指她的不自量力草菅人命,不堪忍受选择自我了断,却意外来到异世。9岁的她是将军府庶女,懦弱不争,却极受将军宠爱,却也是这份宠爱害其溺水身亡。灵魂互换,她将开启怎么的篇章故事?文案无能……
  • 异世界大反派

    异世界大反派

    一个不一样的系统不一样的套路轻松搞笑,无情也有
  • 我是一个道童

    我是一个道童

    穿越了!!穿越成了一个道观里的道童,“每天端茶倒水很不爽的说,怎么办?”“端别,怎么办,难道你想下山不修仙了?”所以主角又端菜倒水去了,“对了,听说老爷有一个老朋友长得那叫标致,不知道你心动没有?”“没有,我真的只想修仙!”主角如是说。简洁版:一小小少年得到了一个宝物,在光怪陆离的世界上戳上几剑的故事。
  • 李玉兰还乡

    李玉兰还乡

    李玉兰回来了,这在烟灯村是件大事。她回来那天,下了一些雨。她在烟灯村满是泥浆的村道上一跳一跳地走着。许多人都看到了这个场景。他们看到李玉兰拎着一只红色皮箱,包得紧紧的屁股蛋子一扭一扭的。当时,李玉兰的家人都在田里栽秧。正是六月天。烟灯村人几乎都在栽秧。其实很多人都看到了李玉兰,但他们都故意装作没看见一样。所以基本上没有人和李玉兰打招呼。李玉兰的父亲李老汉和哥哥李明义更是把腰深深地弓着,他们在栽秧的同时恨不得把脑袋也当成秧棵栽进泥里。只有李玉兰的嫂子林小芹直起了腰,林小芹甩了甩手上的泥水说,玉兰妹子,回了。李玉兰扬声答道,回了嫂子,栽秧呢。
  • 追妻无门:女boss不好惹

    追妻无门:女boss不好惹

    青涩蜕变,如今她是能独当一面的女boss,爱了冷泽聿七年,也同样花了七年时间去忘记他。以为是陌路,他突然向他表白,扬言要娶她,她只当他是脑子抽风,他的殷勤她也全都无视。他帮她查她父母的死因,赶走身边情敌,解释当初拒绝她的告别,和故意对她冷漠都是无奈之举。突然爆出她父母的死居然和冷家有丝毫联系,还莫名跳出个公爵未婚夫,扬言要与她履行婚约。峰回路转,破镜还能重圆吗? PS:我又开新文了,每逢假期必书荒,新文《有你的世界遇到爱》,喜欢我的文的朋友可以来看看,这是重生类现言,对这个题材感兴趣的一定要收藏起来。
  • Valerius Terminus

    Valerius Terminus

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。汇聚授权电子版权。